Whether the facts demonstrate willful violations of protected rights under the Constitution, including the right to life, liberty, property, due process, equal protection, and against cruel and unusual punishment, as well as denial of access to courts, right of association, and the right to vote

ISSUES PRESENTED: A. This unprecedented case is an urgent wake-up call of the lawless, repressive judicial system in the State of Florida that destroys the lives of American citizens. This case is unquestionably the single-most urgent and important matter of the Century in the U.S mandating the en banc adjudication. B. Petitioners are not criminal defendants and are not being held pending any criminal proceeding. Petitioners are Florida citizens and vulnerable adults who _ have been seized and illegally detained in facilities against their will by persons : acting under the auspices of the state of Florida. C. Petitioners are WARDS of the state, the state of Florida? by unlawful detention. Petitioners’ locations are unknown and concealed. Petitioners have been. unable to obtain relief in any court where the unlawful detention occurred. D. Our loved ones, vulnerable American Citizens are being put to death and their assets looted by illegal acts and orders of corrupt judges in Florida. E. These acts are similar to the Kids for Cash scandal unleashed in Pennsylvania that destroyed thousands of lives for years until Judicial remedy obtained. ! F. This Supreme Court hears death row appeals from prisoners yet our most treasured loves ones, vulnerable American adults on whose backs this country was built are being persecuted by the very government itself and must be heard. . G, It shocks the conscience that Petitioners are forced to file this action to plead herein to save the lives, liberty and property of their loved ones and themselves from unthinkable crimes and retaliation taking place in Florida courts. H. This Petition for Habeas Corpus demands urgent and emergency remedy of a massive State of Florida sponsored enterprise depriving a class of American citizens and their families of life, liberty and property. I. This Court has a duty under 42 USC 1986 to protect Petitioners from existing; clear and present; and imminent danger and irreparable harm from crimes against humanity; loss of life, liberty and property; that are state sanctioned, and sponsored by all branches of government in the State of Florida. Petitioner Stone fears her mother has been put to death in vicious retaliation to a prior habeas corpus filed by Petitioner in Florida. Barbara Stone (“Stone”) in re Helen Stone (“Mrs. Stone”) and Lesa M. Martino (“Martino”) in re Roland Martino (“Mr. Martino”) hereby brings this action against the State of Florida and Governor Ronald DeSantis this 26th day of September, 2019. Stone and Martino are hereafter collectively referred to as “Next Friends” and Mrs. Stone and Mr. Martino are collectively referred to as “Petitioners” 3 . IL EMERGENCY RELIEF MANDATED 1. This is an action for Emergency Writs of Habeas Corpus. 2. Petitioners are not criminal defendants and not held in criminal proceeding. 3. Petitioners are Florida citizens and vulnerable adults who have been seized and illegally detained in facilities against their will by persons acting under the auspices of the state of Florida. 4. Petitioners are WARDS of the state, the state of Florida 2 by unlawful detention. 3 5. Petitioners’ locations are unknown and concealed. 6. Petitioners have been unable to obtain any relief in any court in the state of ’ Florida where the unlawful detention occurred. 7. Petitioners are in dire life-threatening danger as their health is frail; advanced age; been emergency hospitalized repeatedly for life threatening conditions; have grave health conditions; illegal illegally detained against their will; grossly retaliated and forcibly removed from their families.