No. 19-6097
Clarence Duke Reynolds v. Virginia, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law appointment-clause constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection hearing-procedure parole parole-board selection-process separation-of-powers standing statutory-interpretation victim-impact
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is §53.1-134, the law used for the selection of parole board members, unconstitutional?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : ; I. Is §53.1-134, the law used for the selection of parole board members, unconstitutional? II. Is the Virginia Parole Board Manual that mandates the use of the "Present Offense" as part of the decision-making for parole eligibility unconstitutidal?} III. Is petitioner being denied his constitutiénal right to a neutral and deteached hearing when sitting members of the parole board are a victim of crime or member of a crime victim's orgdnization? i
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2019)