Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit should grant petitioner's certificate of appealability pursuant to Miller v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 on the questions of his vs. constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ra A). wIMEdHEK WE US. CouRT oF Agrals eR THE NIH CakcurT Svould ¥ Geant (eTrTONER f CORT tcatE of appealability prRsvetT Te MiWER —€\ V. Coc’ 537 US. 382 ON THE QUESTIONS OF Has VSconsts4vson/al Raotts? pertaining we THE Pilasiig : (2) WHEAHER THe GMM CIR. Decision Te praske v. Bi4ER TAS F. 40 sen om Became ANalid final fedegal audomeyt WET Wes a Conchanle CAeteiivation that Was Binding dueinor THE SUBSEQUENT ReseqTenicin and Stake Agpellete pKecendid Involving he corte PaRdiES | ek) fore Ve swen Son (1470) 347 US. vay, YY3 5 U-S. VL Casdillo Bass, 17? 5A 108s ?., I£ $6; (bk WHeHen THE Resentenicing CORT andl Svat Appellee COUT decisions Was ewe len Cleary eotabWsrt fedezal aod, whan Piling te GE Lina cetawt peamnnen on A Constifo-honalidy lo€ fehitiovees OMENEL AS WAS CStdbliShed gy We att E(R. an mookEe, td. yeh finding That pefitionce Senredice WAS Ao \onGEk Uncenstitional UPI, te Resentencing nea ena And peeert eeaceed ings ? (od:wierver THis Honoeable Cour Has algcady considered ancl geBoigcA CAORE Tay) Keetin A \wopsentence” Suvchading’ on NodHomicide SNEenile @ fender, wno iS Alecad seesioh Urcon stitvlional. seareace under Gyahamv. Terida, deo v-S Y® (210) fran the outscA, So +hat w ste can maye A sudamenst (Kathek buy a favAE Vveaed of. special roca Ac) on “the soveniles NCOP BI Ajloiity Based on USN MisbsHavioR oh Bilver to motuee *, rf $a; Ud): tec *he Pesaran Coury Aecisjon +© Keep tHE orginal Sentence Inract, gpedicatid an a foivee Papole reaeing te ASSESS flison misbehavio® oR foilvee to maqRE, WAS contRAm "te and an Untcasmable fggiication of cleaahy establisted Sedeeal () = CONTIN... 1]. Que sions” prese eD 7 {Lad QESBITE To Gpaham xc.” : | AY GD WiHleAWER Ane calefopeia, suppeme CORT pecision | * BA eeaple WV. Sanviin (ZoWe) 63 cal. Ui abl, concerned , 6 : egal Ot arenidment claims ALISIAg, under | "MAIER: Alabama (ao) ou7 us. Ybo? s¢ s05; 9 (er psiete “ME sTAIE peperlate CORK decision bas. : *9 |Conkeagey “te clay Cotblisntd federal Laud PURSUBTIT 11 17D wriltam V By lok, $24 U5, $62, Hog-07, bend Vtom 12 perv, 293 F.3d OND 51, When oviizing ‘the vend a 13 Kedegal AAHeEY TO MoT Peditionsps FedeeaL Bre | Me laMendment claim unde. THE -feon¥tin~ melee; 15 Pecision , Instead of Cpotem, Id 7 | eS . 16 7 || Sweeter we Leann , revision cecsted aWoun] . ACEPHIONS WO sts MEENEES soldi concekN ma IFT AfSiNg under enpiter ad /7.. aE 56, “|ithi wleteR cetitionea Fell Loidhin the Leaning MSN Cxcegtions , Elen IF WIS Geshe assve 21 || Somes anteRjwined a became A msikkg -«ssue7 22 4 sO; : . "TE UMSARER Ahe Sate aggcilate coutt decision 24145 moot Wis Gypatam th ss5s08 under ate Fpanglia | 25 |immiek olecision , constivled| an Re bit Rapa oR. : 26 ||CageiciodS WE Pfecess VidlatioN , Wich 15 Comteagyyp 27 || Ractkmand V-LEWis , Sau _U-5-HO (1498) 7 Kobinson Ve CAL-| a ) i i cox COME Ret | | Bfoeara, 370 V5. 6¢e (ava) © 2 . A LMertek +e. ASss>farvee of CONSE Las SIEGEL oo, os. PURSBAT To STescKland V. Wasting ton , (i404) Hee 7 | 4 <XCERCISE Aircke Aion) am hesefenice. P<Aitioneg | | 3 ucdlee Grohow “hand THE one Hell Uconstifohions: ” Me Geshe 4 and oe ‘iting Ao discos amy of | "ITE Scare cir And e hs Weare meee futons, pease : < £ a) r , fy, ‘ © . , i. Svenides Gen Noes 5 Neai les Pahevlag ly Nonwomicich a . . Tilonk foo 18 a 20 So | 2i: 22 : : | 23 : , 24 . 25 . ; 26 : : 27