No. 19-6103

Farid John Popal v. New York

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2019-10-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence government-misconduct jurisdiction law-enforcement skype-testimony witness witness-coaching witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether law enforcement's coaching the witness violated petitioner's due process rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED * WHETHER LAW ENFORCEMENT'S GOACHING THE WITNESS’ AS HOW . TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, WHILE GOVERNMENT WITNESS WAS . TESTIFYING AGAINST THE PETITIONER FROM FLORIDA VIA SKYPE, BUT WAS SURROUNDED BY THE CASE LEAD DETECTIVE : AND OTHER MEMBERS OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE VIOLATED PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS ‘ RIGHTS UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2019)

Attorneys

Farid Popal
Farid Popal — Petitioner
Farid Popal — Petitioner