Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's state law claims against the defendants for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress

ISSUE PRESENTED I. AN WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAN RECTIFY AN ERRONEOUS , : APPELLATE REVIEW DE NOVO, ON THE GROUND, THE ACT OF CONGRESS WITH THE ALL WRIT ACT 28 U.S.C. § 1651 IN-AID OF JURISDICTION & STAY ON A STATE JUDGMENT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2283 IS A OU. THE LEGAL STANDARD WILL EVADE APPELLATE REVIEW AND HARM PLAINTIFF-PRO SE PARTIES ABSENT a. Pouncy Can Obtain Jurisdiction To The District Court Pursuant To The All Writ Act Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1651, With State . : Claims Of Legal Malpractice, Breach Of Fiduciary Duty, Fraud Pursuant To N.Y. Ct. Judicial Law § 487 And Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress To Rectify The Errors Defendants : . Committed While Representing Petitioner At The Underlying Trial And The District Court Entered An Erroneous Judgment Against Petitioner When The Jury Rendered A Defective Verdict With Inconsistencies Of The Trial 2 b. Petitioner Can Obtain An Injunction For A Stay On The State Court From Entering a State Judgment Against Petitioner Pursuant To I. |THE COURTS BELOW DEPRIVED PETITIONER HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SEEK RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS WHEN THE COURTS BELOW ABRIDGED PETITIONER’S COMPLAINT WHEN COURTS ERRONEOUSLY SUA SPONTE A REVERSAL MOTION WITHOUT EVIDENCE ii) IV. THE DISTRICT COURT’S ORDER IS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS AS A MATTER OF LAW LEGAL STANDARD ROOKER-FELDMAN . V. | MANDAMUS POWER IS WARRANT BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ; SECOND CIRCUIT OPINION CONFLICTS WITH THIS COURT’S DECISIONS IN DENTON, COPPLEDGE, NEITZKE, AND WITH ITS OWN CIRCUIT OPINIONS IN VOSSBRINK, YONKERS, NEW YORK TELEPHONE, AMALFITANO V. ROSENBERG, 533 F.3d 117 AND FEDERAL CASE [DOCKET NO. 06-2364-CV] AND WYLY V. WEISS, 697 F3D 131 (2D CIR.