No. 19-6117
Jaime Ignacio Estrada v. Martin Biter, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining plea-offer preponderance-of-evidence right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standard-of-review trial-counsel voluntary-manslaughter
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner established by a preponderance of evidence trial counsel's violation of the Sixth Amendment: failure to communicate a favorable plea offer petitioner would have accepted had the offer been disclosed to him
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether petitioner established by a preponderance of evidence trial counsel’s violation of the Sixth Amendment: failure to communicate a favorable plea offer petitioner would have accepted had the offer been disclosed to him. 2. Whether the district court clearly erred when it found that petitioner failed to show a favorable offer had been communicated to counsel but not to him. i
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent Martin Biter to respond filed.
2019-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Jaime Estrada
Carolyn D. Phillips — Law Office of Carolyn D. Phillips, Petitioner
Martin Biter
Tami Michelle Krenzin — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent