No. 19-6121

In Re Matthew Lee Staszak

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-violations cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandamus prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should this Supreme Court issue the writ of mandamus to compel the district court to adjudicate petitioner's 28 USC § 2255 habeas corpus petition

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTION FOR THE COURT SHOULD THIS SUPREME COURT ISSUE THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE LOWER U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN ORDER TO COMPEL THE DISTRICT COURT TO EXERCISE ITS ARTICLE III POWERS AND ITS JURISDICTION TO ADJUDICATE PETITIONER'S 28 USC § 2255 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION . IN A TIMELY MANNER, THUS TO SUMMARILY HEAR AND DETERMINE THE FACTS, AND DISPOSE OF THE MATTER AS LAW AND JUSTICE REQUIRED —~ OF PETITIONER'S NUMEROUS GROUNDS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS, PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, ADDITIONAL CLAIMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, AND WHERE ANY DELAY IN ADJUDICATING PETITIONER'S 2255 CASE ON THE MERITS : VIOLATES, INTER ALIA, HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND HIS RIGHT AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT? :

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-17
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Matthew Lee Staszak
Matthew L. Staszak — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent