No. 19-6126
Adelbaset A. Youssef v. Bill Schuette, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abstention appellate-procedure circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights doe-v-univ-of-ky due-process federal-courts judicial-review motion-to-dismiss sprint-communications-inc-v-jacobs standing supreme-court supreme-court-precedent younger-abstention
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess
ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Six Circuit Court of Appeals' decision affirming motion to dismiss on Younger-Abstention conflicts with the Supreme-Court's-decision-in-SPRINT-COMMUNICATIONS-INC.-v.-JACOBS and the same-Court's-decision-on-Doe-v.-Univ.-of-Ky?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Six Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision affirming motion to dismiss on Younger Abstention conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. JACOBS and the same Court’s decision on Doe v. Univ. of Ky? 5 |
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-19
Corrected declaration in support of motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Distributed)
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-01
Waiver of right of respondents The Michigan Board of Medicine, Board Members Mohammed Arsiwala, M.D., Rosalie Tocco-Bradley, M.D.; Bill Schuette (in his individual capacity); and Attorney General Dana Nessel (in her official capacity) to respond filed.
2019-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)
Attorneys
The Michigan Board of Medicine, Board Members Mohammed Arsiwala, M.D., Rosalie Tocco-Bradley, M.D.; Bill Schuette (in his individual capacity); and Attorney General Dana Nessel (in her official capacity)
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent