No. 19-6131
Derrick Estell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924 bodily-harm crime-of-violence criminal-law criminal-offense due-process federal-criminal-law negligence sentencing statutory-interpretation threat-of-bodily-harm unintentional
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a criminal offense that involves as an element an unintentionally or negligently communicated threat of bodily harm qualify as a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 92.4(c)(3)(A)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Can a criminal offense that involves as an element an unintentionally or negligently communicated threat of bodily harm qualify as a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 92.4(c)(3)(A)? ii
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Derrick Estell
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent