No. 19-6136

Thomas A. Bias v. Jimmy Martin, Warden

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment juvenile-sentencing juvenile-sentencing,eighth-amendment,fourteenth-am life-imprisonment miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the state of Oklahoma unconstitutionally imposing continued imprisonment on juvenile's sentenced to life, in disregard of the United States Supreme Court mandatory language of Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 567 U.S. 460, (2012), and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S.Ct. 718, 84 USLW 4063 (2016)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , IS THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA UNCONSTITUTIONALLY IMPOSING CONTINUED IMPRISONMENT ON JUVENILE’S SENTENCED TO LIFE,IN ~ DISREGARD OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT MANDATORY LANGUAGE OF MILLER v. ALABAMA, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 567 U.S. 460, (2012), AND MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA, 136 S.Ct. 718, 84 USLW 4063 (2016). DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ERROR BY NOT AFFIXING JURISDICTION TO A PROPER NEW SUBSTANTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM OF A FUNDAMENTAL PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARD OF A JUVENILE, IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHT AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? iii aan Cm .

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Thomas A. Bias
Thomas A. Bias — Petitioner
Thomas A. Bias — Petitioner