In light of the decisions in Jackson v Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), whether the trial court erred in finding the petitioner guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?

2. Whether Trial Court erred when it allowed the entrance of a photograph of the Victim's apartment which contained the victim's children, because it was relevant and more prejudicial than probative in value is in Conflict with their own precedent "Beverly v Commonwealth" Snarr v Commonwealth and other Sister Circuits "United States v Washington?

3. Whether Trial Court erred in admitting testimony evidence that included inadmissible Hearsay and called for speculation is in Conflict with their own precedent Beverly v Commonwealth, 12 VA App 16 (1991) Snarr v Commonwealth, 131 VA 814 (1921)?

Whether the Virginia Supreme Court and Court of Appeals erred in refusing to set aside the petitioner's conviction and sentence, which violated his rights secured by the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard