Whether the Illinois Appellate Court and Illinois Supreme Court erred in their rulings on the admissibility of hearsay statements, the proper standard for insurance evidence, the standard for proving criminal agency in accidental death cases, and the standard for deliberate prosecutorial misconduct

ESTIONS PRESENTER , , ; 1. WL THIS COURT ANOHESS THE unruct verWEeN THE MKINDIS QUPELLATE. 4") COvICT AN BOTH THE TLLINDIS : SUPREME COURT ANA ARrELLTE (3°) CovRT Wek HLM ROLEAF EMINENCE, OOM an SeON T2S (eS S/US~ 104 PREEXITING SECTION T25 WLCS S/(1S10.20 , ANG THE WNEROPER ARKUSSION OF HEARSAY STatentenTs Z _ Lo Ww tis wont ANARESS THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE (LIMOS APPELLATE CHM) OORT GMA THE, HLNONS SUPREME: COURT WHER THE TEOTLE. U. FLOYA QUESTION QE STATE OF MN HEARSAY STATEMENTS ALSPLAYING ONLY 4 TEL reasONAL reams, WATHODT TORE, BEING RELEVANT T0 A EFENAANTS. STATE. OF HNL. ok THE LIKELIAODOL 4 ineoreney DEMONSTRATING Praredsnty 7 SHODLA THAS GIOKT CONDINERE AMENDING FENERAL RULE OF EUIKENCE BUS(T) RY ANOPTING THER” ANMENKDEL, AD HAS THE STATE oF WLW, CORSON THe WSWED ANRRESSEA HEREIN ? i ee : : ; © D.SHOULA. THE EXTREMELY KENOMICLRL HEAROAY TESTIMONY AF RECLARANT MATH. WELL ROCUMTENTED HENTAL UUNESS : | RE ANISNIBLE IN A HORNER TRIAL? sHoDLA THA AcLLAGANTS NEHONSTRAGLE LES ABOUT. SPECIFIC WSTANCES 0F NOMESTIE NHDLENDE. WENRER IMAKMIESSIBLE HER PRIOR STATEMENTS INTROROCEN UNKER THE NOMESTIE VIOLENCE WEARIAN ExteRTION 2 4. WML Ts WORT AMATESS THE CONFLIET ETHEN THE WLUNDIS SUPREME CIORTS ROLING ESTABLISHASMKING THE wR, PUONGER ALHIGMIBILETY THRESH FOR LE INSORANCE EMIRENCE (SEE REORLE V. G0DEAS AA erie HTL ) aNd THE fLLtwo1s : APPELLATE. CH") (GORTS NELENT NELISION. TH QISREGAID THAT THREDLA ANA RELY SOLELY. URON WNFERENLES 2 | S. SHODLA THIS COURT ESTAIBLISH , 1H CADED OF AWLEGEA BUT UNPROVE HOMICINE INNDLNING KRARNING 0 OTHER AREDAMIN ACLINENTAL KERTH , CASES IM WIHILA READONAGLE HERICAL MYPOTREES CONSISTENT MIITH ACLINENTAL QEATH HAVE BEEK PROWEA, @ ORE STRINGENT STANAAKG OF QT LEAST A REQUIREMENT OF CLOVER SCMOTINN FOR. THE. FURIE OF THE REQOLSYTE. CRIMINAL AGENCY 2 G. WILL TIS COUNT ARORESS THE CONFLICT KETWEEN (LLIN) REVIEWING COOKS OVER THE PROPER STANUARA OF KEMHEM FOR CLAITYS #€ (NELIWERATE PIROSELOTORIAL MISLONNUCT , ANA ELAMINE OWE INA RUMING TRENK OF PROSELOTORS EMPLOYING KELIRERATE. WISCONRUCT ANA RECEPTION AD A MEANS TO GPLSTER WEAK, LIRLUMSTANTIAL Cases 7 T. — WL THIS CODRT ANARESS THE POLACTICE OF ROSELOTORS USING GOVERMENT POWER ANA UNLIMITER BUQLETS 7 WEAROMIZE CATERT OPINION TESTIMONY @3 A TEANS TO CREATE, THIRODEH CONT SANCTIONED PFINIUN'S AWA SPELDLATION, Facts AMA EUIRENCE WIMICH ODEO NOT QTHERMISE EXIST 7 SHOULD THIS COURT ESTABLISH A STANKARD FOR ANTISSION OF EXPERT TRRGON TESTIMONY BEXDND FRYE WHICH REQUIRES & HOKE SUTUNGENT EXATIINATION OF ANY EXPERT OPUHING URON A HAMNER OF DEATH, AND OE THE FOUNDATIONAL FACTS OPON WAMICH THE OPINION IS PRERICATEA 7 "" USTOF PARTIES = { ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [Vv] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all