No. 19-6151
Ahmed Ali v. Tammy Foss, Acting Warden, et al.
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rights due-process habeas-corpus jury-instruction jury-instructions third-party-culpability trial-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-03-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying a Certificate of Appealability on his claim that he was denied his right to present a defense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying a Certificate of Appealability on his claim that he was denied his right to present a defense by the trial court’s refusal to give his jury instruction concerning his defense of third party culpability?
Docket Entries
2020-03-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-01-31
Brief of respondents Tammy Foss, Acting Warden, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 3, 2020.
2019-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2020 to February 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-02
Response Requested. (Due January 2, 2020)
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Ahmed Ali
John Owen Lanahan — Law Office of John Lanahan, Petitioner
Tammy Foss, Acting Warden, et al.
Daniel Brian Rogers — Office of the California Attorney General, Respondent