No. 19-6154
Joanthony Deaundre Johnson v. Missouri
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cell-phone criminal-procedure digital-evidence fifth-amendment fourth-amendment particularity-requirement search-and-seizure self-incrimination warrant-particularity
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy
AdministrativeLaw Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a warrant authorizing the search of a cell phone and describing the things to be seized as 'all data/software' pertaining to the crimes is offensive to the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a warrant authorizing the search of a cell phone and describing the things to be seized as "all data/software" pertaining to the crimes is offensive to the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement? 2. Whether compelling an individual whom a search is being directed against to furnish a decrypted cell phone in a criminal case is offensive to the Fifth Amendment's assurance that no person shall be compelled to be a witness against himself? ia ‘ i ' o
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-08
Waiver of right of respondent Missouri to respond filed.
2019-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Joanthony Johnson
Joanthony Deaundre Johnson — Petitioner
Missouri
Daniel N. McPherson — Missouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent