No. 19-616

W.A., Individually and on Behalf of W.E., et al. v. Hendrick Hudson Central School District

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: circuit-split deference-to-administrative-decisions due-process free-appropriate-public-education idea-fape-private-school-deference-administrative- individuals-with-disabilities-education-act private-placement school-district-obligations special-education-law standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference: 2020-01-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a school district defaults on its obligations to provide a student with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as guaranteed by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, what is the standard to determine whether a parent's private placement is proper under the Act?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When a school district defaults on its obligations to provide a student with a disability a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as guaranteed by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seg. (the IDEA), what is the standard to determine whether a parent’s private placement is proper under the Act? 2. What is the level of deference that a district court must provide to the state proceeding on the issue of whether a private school is appropriate? li RELATED CASES W.A. v. Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist., No. 14-CV3067 (KMK), 2017 WL 3066888 (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2017) W.A. v. Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist., 219 F. Supp.3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) WA. v. Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist., No. 14-CV8093 (KMK), 2016 WL 1274587 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2016) Application of the Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District, N.Y. State Educ. Dep't, State Review Officer, Appeal No. 14-015 (Mar. 18, 2014) Application of a Student with a Disability, N.Y. State Educ. Dep’t, State Review Officer, Appeal No. 12-138 (Jan. 31, 2014) In Matter of Impartial Hearing, Impartial Hearing Officer Findings of Fact and Decision (Dec. 17, 2013) In Matter of Due Process Complaint of W., Impartial Hearing Officer, Findings of Fact and Decision (June 21, 2012)

Docket Entries

2020-01-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
2019-12-26
Reply of petitioners W.A., Individually and on Behalf of W.E., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-16
Brief of respondent Hendrick Hudson Central School District in opposition filed.
2019-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
2019-09-05
Application (19A256) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until November 11, 2019.
2019-08-29
Application (19A256) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 12, 2019 to November 11, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.

Attorneys

Hendrick Hudson Central School District
Daniel PetigrowThomas, Drohan, Waxman, Petigrow & Mayle, LLP, Respondent
Daniel PetigrowThomas, Drohan, Waxman, Petigrow & Mayle, LLP, Respondent
W.A., Individually and on Behalf of W.E., et al.
Marion M. WalshLittman Krooks LLP, Petitioner
Marion M. WalshLittman Krooks LLP, Petitioner