No. 19-6165
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process pro-se pro-se-representation probation right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can Virginia constitutionally hale a person into its criminal courts and there force a lawyer upon him, even when he insist that he wants to conduct his own defense?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. CAN VIRGINIA CONSTITUTIONALLY HALE A PERSON INTO ITS CRIMINAL COURTS AND THERE FORCE A LAWYER UPON HIM, EVEN WHEN HE INSIST THAT HE WANTS TO CONDUCT HIS OWN DEFENSE ? ‘II. THE VIRGINIA COURTS ERRED WHEN THEY CONCLUDED THE UNITED STATES ; CONSTITUTION DOES NOT PROVIDE A RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN A PROBATION , REVOCATION HEARING. THE COURTS ERRED BY NOT UPHOLDING PETITIONER'S STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Ricky G. Davis
Ricky G. Davis — Petitioner