No. 19-6169

In Re Anthony Brawner

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-10-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdiction mandamus maryland-jurisdiction sixth-amendment subject-matter-jurisdiction trial-rights venue
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the District of Columbia superior court have subject matter jurisdiction over crimes that happen in the State of Maryland?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

estion(s) presented. ——— : Sbleof Authentics. IStotement of jurisdichon “wit ___ —_ 0G nstitutional provisions and | Shotutes javolveQ TT [Statement of Case [Summory of Arguemenk a , Reason for granting writ 7 | onclusion 2 | lable Ort A ATHNO ki a — page(s) Adair v..United_ States , 91 A.2A288,290 (1978) ames. United States. ee 478 A.ad 1083 1984 Dc App bexis G4o(0.C.1984) _ juivecmony Busn (2007, CAio Utaln)213 Feol App 675 | United Stote’s v. BlecKor 3S NBL ICAU VA) 657, Fad 62924 cern CCE 81838 (1982) 454 US ITHO OZ ‘WUnted States vy Bowlden | He My, 878 (AF CM. i983) t | “Tndex sto Appendices __T

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-20
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)

Attorneys

In Re Anthony Brawner
Anthony Brawner — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent