Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals abuse its discretion when it committed clear error of judgment, by relying on clearly erroneous findings of fact?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals abuse its discretion when it committed clear error of judgment, by relying on clearly erroneous findings of fact? ; 2) Did District Court J udge Aaron Dan Polster abuse his discretion/commit structural error when he openly admitted that he was a party (adverse party _ ; opponent) to the "proceedings," yet proceeded to preside over. the "proceedings" . oe anyway (In re Murchison, 340 U.S.133, 75 S8.Ct.623, 99. L. Ed. 942 (1955)? ; Petitioner is Pro Se litigant pursuant to Haines v. Kerner : (404 U.S. 519) : 2 . . : LIST OF : PARTIES , &) All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page, . {] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all