Whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits the warrantless seizure and search of a person's cell phone data incident to arrest when the phone is not immediately associated with the crime of arrest

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; a Lo . o drscl Pxorore AWG ne. Vee of ¢ ng nt tx SoS¢ bine O&lices Mecke< wn Nostole, vA, of . o o v a 25, O hs a-2 > \ {> C é ‘a who Min Oy ial h A OM Mo + Bouts & Sale Cabri. 1a A nt mae aks low Ce. ps O OX Tal ONAN be nce af) borrnll wAwecd LA 324 Po mS LSS 2 : B : t a . Pat . Vv AGarss: Dads\Na.coen Pages AS. Beaty espe Ale ox ne Baee ALR ves 25 G Lors 2 =) Cen by 4 . . ps Pia Rid Ga * ah : N at Aln.S 4 Conrxc, ok Owixcles Sos en b DZ. 92.5 AnD ey KS So ASOS mands o Swxers AY . a AE! i DO Quretiown / wea (5526). Awol 'm tonBlicr Witdes Umiesecl Skanes Ni natn diionh,393.F od soy csecn (Wh tre, aa03), fl © 1 : y . . Roe wesmedioxe S2Met tursdex Lircoosclonesy thx conensiecnince.5 pt res dacaMy woe ctrvcey me somealey oy av toy ° B . : Vv -. fa 4.5 9 ote < news " : —_ Wnoerex D\N5 ap So : ’ nay 2 24 ANY OS BSS Cente 5 80 16M. BNO ES PbS Sov, IW\in's NASM golert tink Noe oo f : F ‘ a > y of 4 ta okie.) pre, settle ws o& ene Bu be. ive pirsoneih Boe nok yroce 2 > : 22 eink é, Sworix ANE, I LL TET '