a warrantless arrest, without search or warrant to enter a home without exigent circumstances is a constitutional violation under the 4TH Amendment?.

Whether the court finds that the moving party did not receive notice under Federal Rule 77(d) for the entry of the judgment or order sought to be appealed within 21 days after entry; and the failure to inform the defendant of his right to appeal and his right to have counsel appointed on appeal (if indigent) is in violation of the defendant's Constitutional rights under the 14 Amendment by depriving the defendant the right to a Direct Appeal, due process?. SEE ROe vs. Flores-Ortega

Whether this practice by depriving a defendant a procedural right to Direct Appeal, Post Conviction motion, because of the defendant lack of Knowledge of the law and the failure of counsel to inform client of that right is ineffective assistance of counsel and in violation for defendant's 6TH Amendment Constitutional rights see Roe vs Flores-Ortega and Gilberto Garza, Jr. Petitioner v. Idaho No. 17-1026

Whether the defendant's constitutional rights were violated by the court's failure to appoint counsel and provide adequate assistance of counsel