Whether the defendant's constitutional rights were violated by the court's failure to appoint counsel and provide adequate assistance of counsel

No question identified. : BO 7 9ZO/-L1 “YP a4Yupr A SL 1 ‘ut yz0g of 4ag/19 puo vba -SAI0J J SA doy FAIS : 2 s4ybis JBuaNpYsveD UAW pLIHy 41 5 puns uarap +40 ~ een Ul pu jasunor +o 22UHfSISSO anlfrafpyaul SI ‘V4ol out Fo jfuallz wsOjul of asUNOD jo danfrofp——~ “ puv mol ay, fo abpatmouyy fo 20] juvpuatep aut 40 ° gsnovag” “uonour ang nU0D 4AsO/ ‘ yoaddy paiq of yb jornperosd D juupuatap v burarsdap hg aoygosd siyp sayyouy e ab apag-sasoly $A aay 775° 4 3837010 amp Word — Qaasig 0 af pybld ous funpuatdpy ay} butnidap hg vaupoawy Hy Oye JapUn stb [over pry 4svo7 sFupuafay ayy an id “varpoporn ul~sI~ (suabipur-ti)oaddo ve pazuroddy ~ Jasunay amy of yb sty pun —poatdo—ay Fy “ SIY fo juvpuarap ay, ~wsotul of Jasunoa” asuazap fo aunjret ayt poo ~ chaywa—Jayto shojo 1g Uiy Li pajoaddy — ~~ ag og 44onos 4aplo 30 fuavabpnl aur 40 haywa “aY44 f? (P? LL ary , ed ee Japun PI1}OU INDI04 FOU ~~ ~ pip hytod bumou ayf “4044 Spulf JNO] au] LOYJOUY (2 . j puaupually yp WE — “" yapun Uolpojain OUAI{N{}sUO2 VY SI SJIUDISWHIIMID ~~ 4uabig fNOYLIM aUsoy Y A{UA Of” pUVITYM 45AIIO ~ JO y2swas 4#NOYPIM “ssa1IU S54] fUDLIGM 7] JOYZO4/Y G G3.LN4S3ud (S)NOLLSANOD