No. 19-6198

Gonzalo R. Rubang, Jr. v. United Airlines, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination federal-jurisdiction federal-money fraud labor-dispute labor-law negligence standing worker-compensation worker-endangerment worker-rights workplace-safety
Key Terms:
Environmental
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the injured workers of United Airlines, Inc. were denied their right to be heard in court regarding allegations of fraud, negligence, and worker endangerment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Just surprise me that myself and fellow injured Mechanics and other ground personnel at UNITED AIRLINES, INC in San ~Francisco International Airport in San Francisco, California, we the victims of fraud, negligence, worker endangerment the State Courts and California US COURTS not giving us chance to be heard. if only given a chance to have a simple court trial, let both sides exchange views and let these courts listen. Unfortunately, the said courts never allow us to be heard. Such as we let the Counsel of UAL to provide " legitimate " work rules that being implemented every day that we know UAL never had in years. For the reasons every time we the Mechanics and other ground personnel every time we have acceptance work rule elections, the said ballots we used never had serial numbers and no stubs. Meaning all the work rules every day in years that implemented denying offering summer of 2008 all benefits and our disability retirements we the inured worker earned, the said work rules never exist. These are the issues we the injured workers of UNITED AIRLINES, INC " Workers of America " had been denied several times or every time we are suppose to have a court hearing always blocked by the State Courts Judges and the California US Court Judges. We the victims we need to be heard. Why we are not being heard? We contribute to the US economy. This case involves " Federal Money " and the employer UNITED AIRLINES, INC involves to " Worker Endangerment "in years. That the US SUPREME COURT should focus its attention. v . :

Docket Entries

2020-02-27
Case considered closed.
2019-12-26
Application (19A709) denied by Justice Kagan.
2019-12-13
Application (19A709) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of December 9, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2019-12-09
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 30, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2019)

Attorneys

Gonzalo R. Rubang
Gonzalo R. Rubang Jr. — Petitioner
Gonzalo R. Rubang Jr. — Petitioner
United Airlines, Inc.
R. Wardell LovelandSuite 300, Respondent
R. Wardell LovelandSuite 300, Respondent