No. 19-6199
Emeterio Espino Ramirez v. United States
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights indictment jury-trial prior-conviction sentencing statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant’s statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt? i
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-22
Reply of petitioner Emeterio Espino Ramirez filed. (Distributed)
2020-01-08
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 8, 2020.
2019-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 9, 2019 to January 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2019.
2019-10-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Emeterio Espino Ramirez
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent