No. 19-6210
Marcus Jackson v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-standard case-by-case case-by-case-analysis circuit-split civil-procedure factual-circumstances federal-procedure judicial-review reasonable-time rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b6
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appropriate application of Rule 60(b)(6) requires a full case-by-case analysis of the factual circumstances, or whether a less stringent review is permissible
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN ORDER TO RESOLVE A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SIXTH, FIFTH AND NINTH CIRCUITS ON WHAT IS THE ; APPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF RULE 60(B)(6), REASONABLE TIME ANALYSES . WHERE THE SIXTH CIRCUIT REVIEW DO NOT REQUIRE A FULL ANALYSIS OF THE FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH CASE, YET A FULL CASE BY CASE INQUIRY OF THE FACTS OF EACH CASE IS REQUIRED BY THE FIFTH AND NINTH CIRCUITS.
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent Noah Nagy, Warden to respond filed.
2019-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Noah Nagy, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent