Is it proper and timely for this Supreme Court to give redress to pronouncements incorporated within earlier landmark decisions stating that recidivism of sex offenders is 'frightening and high,' after multiple academic studies and state sponsored surveys determined those earlier pronouncements to be erroneous?

QUESTION PRESENTED . Is it proper and timely for this Supreme Court to:give redress to: pronouncements incorporated within earlier landniark decisions stating that. recidivism of sex offendets is “frightening and high,” (an admonition Tennessee legislators relied upon in.crafting Tennessee law) after multiple academic studies and. state sponsored surveys determined those earlier . pronouncements to be errorieous?