No. 19-6214

Luis Fuquen v. Trina Everitt

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2019-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: best-interest-of-the-child child-custody divorce due-process family-privacy family-privacy-rights family-rights first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech freedom-of-association freedom-of-religion parent-child-rights parental-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Luis and his children are entitled to due process protections for their individual intimate and expressive, close family, parent-child speech, association, worship, and family privacy rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Whether Luis and his children are entitled to due process protections for their individual intimate and expressive, close family, parent-child speech, association, worship, and family privacy rights as provided by the First Amendment and applied to the state TC through the Fourteenth Amendment in a child custody controversy incident to divorce between two fit natural parents; whether the state may vacate individual intimate and expressive, close family, parent-child speech, association, worship, and family privacy rights as a consequence of the parents exercising a lawful and constitutionally protected choice regarding marriage—to dissolve the marital association—and license these rights back to the state’s preferred parent based solely upon the viewpoint of a sole government official regarding matters of conscience in child-rearing—the best interest of the child determination; and whether the family law TC (TC), in this controversy between two fit parents regarding their constitutional rights, has lawful authority or jurisdiction to limit constitutional rights beyond the scope and limitations imposed through Article VI of the United States Constitution. PETITION FOR CERTIORARI ii

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-30
Petitioner complied with order of December 9, 2019.
2019-12-09
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 30, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2019)

Attorneys

Luis Fuquen
Luis Fuquen — Petitioner
Luis Fuquen — Petitioner