Maxcium Herring v. L. S. McEwen, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether the trial court erred in allowing the defendant to take the witness stand in his own defense
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . — TE a sab repesented detandomt Takes We witness stand in vis om heh — dtKense whaler, ONL CoMines To peprsent her or rise or wheter The Teial rout must depart cuunsel To easel Aue, Ws orcticel Stade of the | Yotedtan, Bld | a | . OD. Califienion fre oxen anions Saw Ral Cade 8 12024. S3 sul LL) Chersynal use Of A renga’) Auloorizt The Siete To tivfose 0 Minato! wininua” Tem of Ten yeas, Witere Other Swilan GrARUTOD gpmramtu A defendent 0 StMleny VAghT TG D Lesser Fern lopstd ON THE Sept facts WIE disloy of A Eeercr' durin) THE Commission oF a teamed, 14-1 | ' ca INA SHE Got Roceediay, Surana Trl Whee, & STote Tral tot ReseMled Willy o Colovd\e’ dor of Jury MUCcondu, THE Trial cous most de VOR Thun tee mdfrue THE Jury, RD 2B-3S (4) TN a halvecs borgis3 proceed, tt & defendant Monta. Toy dedlion TO THE maaisirariet REFaT Od recdommendélon. Whether, A defend Wes 4 Sfrvtory P| C28 vAl$ L3U WL To hove he Frélval Twekivas bin Aol torclustoad rR de NNO 09 ry oe 5) DeTeRMiNe wheter TRE NINTH tata] incorrect peelitd The bof, Slandard OR Whether Tre (Seu ranged ty Tre Orainal Waloers Lorgss yGlon ard (wh) | MALT tye ddequele To dewnle wn Courngement To Prceed Furtnee Cait