No. 19-6227
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights contempt-of-court dismissal due-process frivolous in-forma-pauperis sanctions standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Antitrust DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Antitrust DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the dismissal of a case as 'frivolous' under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 18 U.S.C. §402 violates the 6th and 10th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : dy Rey Coster Choe Sitcen Tol Bet f dian s Supreme Court Of The United States | RAE aMes FITTED SOLE oT Hr PRODUCTIONS. IFITTED FABLES Parseneceoes, D SERIE cer In re.: Cestui Que Steven Talbert Williams v. United aaa States, et al., Docket No. I 19-1392(2"4 Cir. Ct.), 19-5405 C-S-S-6t7 2 CERTIORARI QUESTIONS 1, 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 18 U.S.C. §402 (dismissal for “frivolous{ness];” U.S. Const. Am. 6, 10): a. Whether the “ORDER” (
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Steven Talbert Williams
Steven Talbert Williams — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent