No. 19-6228
Anson Chi v. Andrew Stover, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-misconduct civil-procedure civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process government-misconduct habeas-corpus judicial-review medical-records post-conviction-review procedural-default torture
Latest Conference:
2019-12-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the U.S. Court of Appeals intentionally delaying the mailing of its December 7, 2018 opinion
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS) PRESENTED A. Was: the U.S: Court of hppeoks uittae for : , interctienally delay tg the moulieg. of it < December 7 . oO 26 UZ, opinion, memerandvney then mailing, He op in om Tarzan 2 LOG, which Che receweh on ecnyary. 5 we J Pekitin (ar Panel eg, add, Pesitita. Por a lex AUS 2 Chals case Wolves pe ice. torture; doctored / , medi col peesrk S. cove RE. the +e ature a chs : riba Chals former de pense ottor ee OG a | foton Soh Brook Beets te conspire. wit the Oo 4 ve vx Ar ira aa Ge ee mee Al a the Goverment ta uses Chale ds cere faltered | et eters, Be | | | .
Docket Entries
2019-12-16
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2019-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent