John Joseph Douglas v. United States
HabeasCorpus
Whether a state's aiding and abetting statute that is broader than the federal generic definition can qualify as a predicate offense under the ACCA
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : _ I. | IF A STATES AIDING AND ABETTING STATUTE IS BROADER THAN THE FEDERAL GENERIC DEFINITION; DOES AIDING AND ABETTING AGGRAVATED ROBBERY QUALIFY AS A PREDICATE . OPRENSE ONDER. THETA.C.C.A. IN THAT STATE:? oFT, DOES MINNESOTA'S AGGRAVATED ROBBERY STATUTE -WHICH ALLOWS COVICTIONS FOR SUDDEN SNATCHINGSTILL QUALIFY AS AN A.C.C.A. PREDICATE AFTER THE SUPREME COURTS DECISION ; IN STOKELING ?. , _ III. IF A STATUTE ON ITS FACE IS OVERBROAD, CAN THE COURT LOOK BEYOND THE STATUTE OF CONVICTION TO A LESSER : INCLUDED OFFENSE OF A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE TO DETERMINE THAT THE OVERBROAD STATUTE NOW QUALIFIES ?