Whether the U.S. District Court abused its discretion in dismissing the case, in violation of the petitioners' civil-rights, due-process, and free-speech rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #\, USnelven wlheakive desdkmace G& Couns was Anwbl eas Cont Aggoulked cour LAE CRs dice \e PASE TMSAKMLE Viva tas re Wddle Ge Ley angele KOR CoSE THA, wget ke Ye Baimoed docks gordo ann! dy Wadtrct & Cddrodds GrEUMEd dear & Wwe Vad dutloa Yn work Gite Wes Lo Nae cout doors QR WN OSAKE awd ‘Ena Ae Ss uve & adding arte WANE Ac Ye ASwubu. 44. Woden Yo vs dtticd a a deat Oro Gliese daar She WON Dhak Aud Used wad Wecderneinn Xtors Youn wk west Mark Loc Woe \easiea 1S PAVE Ares. da, Wadler Licwiphhady Eodee dx funy You, Wy COMO EN EM QOE Bad wield ‘oy Yren; aman Star Be SOE Xals on Yve Les dndy, K& Ye cobb edtaceliy Mauer 15, Daddter ad uh Aner tequehed by Navies A Discovedy: Ercgtery VGEKE 6 bo he \austel BG KE ANE BWATAL Sted do Wook asd average aud ade“ REED Od winineld hecauee cathtol POA MEd WILE Wind pecially, ded Va de Wades 1shediing SAA wer Brod bu Svea \egaugth Lane HE WD Gbe arante Km Ques CoOds WARES Dee CUED ud & coer wd EQ Nek “\e Sida You oa ba wing Wok & add Mok bed rah \iayad Words DE qin, AN Noy CSE smu BLURAY dq, WSredver Adal \wdae eited neu re avsided (peek 380k Hood Ulmer mde pvddte by, ockesdonr \ Wwe seteatiag iw Waacih) Loy, wspous 5G Yad: he OAL (uo A & oiclwar Loads & yee we aleced to \rure dae Sesdiads? . . : ; . 4g Waddie \nad Ns eed by Wise, We awe Aanngns euincisy Mer avd Eto Wh bande anh Sudsied Wu Mee COW PESOS be GE ud wseigll Lo Meh Leck noon leattrtetrth Autwa delioeariots WH Vebet CADEAES Yow, Ye cou. 4a. \ Qader She Ledinay & Dre Cusdads WhidhES vay pusdbise, Charges car he Crested GHoktaled wt RaTUibAKE ol Rent gedrrninag bo Does pending Onssges Gt Wer dens uloricug Qreic Lek: bey 410. Wdaddver Src cout teed ty gusidiig Se det Yhe Mod Ste ok CD (unts Mer netug Mike AUME touk(d) -Apsae Yoalns mind shete wcdh Gah other sesinio She inseges Quan esioa but Yok he aud OS Obes. \pts \ad iV Aowe & week EVE.