Whether incarcerated pro se litigants' custody, parental rights, property, and financial matters are at issue in a bona fide civil action seeking access to courts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : . /. £©S a * Fooly Law BDiverce Proceeding © in Which ingarcerated “Pra Set litigants Custedy® Parental , Property and Fononcal Mant s ace at 1 s40e @& . " Bona Fide Civil Aatren® was canting Aceess Te Courts @ (Leas v Casey (ie) 1B US B43 Borns v Omith 1877) 430 ¥S BIT) Aviva & Divitheria, CSB F3d (ot AthCir Aci) Snyder Vv Nclaan, BBC F3d . 279 TthAr Zeorw). 2. Dees Court CrerkkKy Pho ed UGLLL 2G, , te File Subrntted Pre Se’ Ikgant documbnt eelfou 7 +o Send Pro Se lchaants Orders of th'e Caryrt: — od farsifky doc ments Fesalting in| Prejudice te the litvqant have aleSotute or " Quad, Tadicia\" IMAMUNAY fran 1983 Action? (Antoine v Syers C1993) Sc@ us 429; Harlecs »v Fitrzeratd CI@ezy\ 457 WS 8007 Silva, Supra » Snyder, Supra). , 3. Can this Action in Which Appellant : Seuent Declarater / Prospeckue / Za oNetion | colsee on the cole at te et Cenere ° Pre be Lithaornt doormeayts loe hald a “Folate To State a Claim " and "Str le “ Under ecton s415 2 ( Pallham v Allen, C1IASd) dele | us 522), — 4. Bad Pehthoner Crepenty Plead a clenrret oft ZQv0o0 Protection Clarann in the Court Clierle wm rebi Sal +O Eile Sulem Wed Pres Se Vheant Goaumants failure +o Sand Ordars of two Cart and Cofi sal of Sail thelo Facttatec +s help * ‘Nearcarated”" Pro 4. . At Rqants Feqoe Stina Salp 2? (Cleburne Ne Cleburye — teyeng Che OWS) 473 Mos 437)