Whether the sanction imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

No question identified. : — CN [he Subreme Lou 4 F £0 Wed OES of Ata 4 INES ? (ause No: ee AIENf BENE KGaLS | RECEIVED _| Ob Anat, SEND Grliit Leth pe LWNited States EAMES Laden aid dicot edilen | c the Axewt bY SLE} 01 AIVERGNG Original Wsditil Wider Arhile ID 6 ME Lash iti, DE HE Lhe SPAIES, AGUS LF hasland US. Lest Aap > A Rehifosl LoPleintPR AN bat ila) Wout Bt aid oF LIE Loutts Affe Node Tatirdichin Shall be billed AS Patided i Kile 20 NEG fH Tel. I S Svante by Me Lou LAM Ctl Nad Wp Aupper zed 5 y vk USC EUS) lS Not A pitt ok pit bit of At cetin Storing Veter cised » JO TLLKY AEA MAND DE ANY Wt, POE ComPlant st Slow Lah LOL betit Wl LE wy ad oF dhe Guts APE late Jatisdtionl, Mat LP final Circdmtences ittust PRE Execase pt HE Loutls dscaetintay [3e6s, ANd teal Ade dat (eM tater b¢ db hudtéd ht ANY pthek Lota ae fap ANY . Wy) Wa out fse : . ) | ible nal : if ate Bes — : ok About AbI7, YE United States Lisp h haut, forA 2. Crank Lutth Lis bored tee kro kiln 9 ANY SUttE WM PRE . Soubpern) District Bac for Llucs sub Jk th reathet MS NAS KEK AUN LOESUP EMAIL Is. A Vial hion OF LEE COWS Apents OAtb SE aFEIE, fo Pletcl Mbt Cpl Sh Pubioh Aad Wk [Epa al kiles Liv Z Pratedtté., JE LIS fate LIE, PUMA AED, Lssye rom (LE li ted SiS DIAN AL US PR?” Gri ¢ Vinlelé ConPlut dUE-0lESS L215, Wit bore, Louth Neler1ssued ANA oder 7? SLOW CAC, Witte HE de Pasco bV Mk Fecha [hues Cid ratedute. SEE Sb RE. Dctte DEs Pte PGE. L yf Burt failure 4 hth portale tt} Lew FL, (Stitt ft LDF Billok LX Lanse fochket fok [RIUM LE Lourt tilled that A113 pes Lwade}sv\e butNerer hua WE Ly Stellan t Wilt) MOE PLE LTELLEM liter LIC fy bY Weeping PoE LN peu? And Ctededatk rad sctottt, Not CE biting PE MiounZ, PAE LowEk (oil's 0 Vaislatin. LE LE frit ANd lending beast ey Lied 7a tour Fo lefyr PEE SAMA PRG SEE UCC Y 5 @ | . | an ot 5 aa MVLOE: 7 TIE Lower Eowurt 13 BBM Sid LEOUSE LB 15 1b PY Son tem, LLL Lowery Lonel bas bill! Ltrks, Ato Tin Sen. Hof peti LONE ee We Ig Ltd fp Sho, Api Lower Loire Bis. 5¢ lhe Prison System fo SAP RNG fom Ping, WAALS A dENialok Ages fo He 0 Justttin> bf bra ting this ¢s. Cheadle LOE Shion 1s A Valationl ok PUKS. ME Process, AL Wlech Mee MLS ts tL AI Cd ft -Lald cOk Const tabie Anh LE SAM tol? Vaelteteind of LE [edhia| Kiles Cr. Procedure LES Ld LV tight to Show Cpus€, fLMWe EK Fe HE '500.00 thing is Evtemp tin, however Lee yt t (Aawer Cult did Wt MIE PPE ped. fekuse ty Bet bit Lied po elicdied tak gocvroentethianl¢ Ube Y 1 eh io PPE Lo WE Coutd <teled fo be het pe Ooilozent, tnd Meet tt, HAS LAE Wb ADE p Weft fee __ COM LE Ab patie 17 ANY alter Farr Frooe Any Louie, SEE UCL E.4, by Keeoss the Me spc hoy ¢s Orid. CONCUSSION. VHGNS sez pli Lot? Po [ESE POE. SANCKION DN Sop thes Coat bill ¢ py ez) tend Tithing ty | this 2s Un titlled bok, Mus Cate p (05 cde ple $lle__ LEWC LS PLOUY le Ppl BOLOUSE AL Lia bE S72 OPV CL (otlEG ~ WA : _ Mitre, V4 . ; z AM KGRES Lesenpe eed b . UEC /-30 : Concise Statement _ Parks is being bully by this lower Court for filing a subject matter jurisdiction, the order of July 5 2017, totally unfair the sanction impose are in violation of the rules of the court, Parks was never serve any notice nor did Parks have a chance to respond to the sanction. Parks never had a sanction hearing, totally a violation of the Courts oaths of office, and a departure of the rules of the court. ) | 7 @ Reason relied on for the allowance of the writ The United States Court of Appeals, for the Seventh Circuit, is a bully, this order is in violation of every treaty the United States with other nation and the lower Court has departed from the Norm that warrant the Court intervention. The action of this Court are usurp and violate the Federal Rules civil The Court is and outlaw, kangaroo, this type of action must not stand in the Court. The action of the lower court is criminal, injustice and has no support behind it this Court must take this case under consideration, this case is one of and exceptional case that warrant this cour