Was the Petitioner restored prior to the November 2009 trial?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #1 Was the Petitioner:restored Prior to the Noverber 2009 Trial ? #2 Was the Petitioners Due Process of Law violated by being Tried in Novenber 2009,while legally incompetent ? #3 Did the District Court ERROR in using a false premise that Petitioner was restored in 2005 in their 2011 Doc 427 Conclusion of ,competent to proceed ? #4 Did the District Court ERROR in declining a retroactive competency determination regarding petitioners competency to have stood trial in Doc 427,page 10 ? #5 Did the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ERROR in the denial of the Petitioners Direct Appeal 11-3717, 12-2707 on June 21st 2013,see page 10 and 1l,using false premise that petitioner was restored in 2005 ? #6 Does the U.S.Suprene Court need to decide the questions, for National Inportance as both the lower courts decisions were erroneous,when the record shows contrary ? i