No. 19-6260

Craig Cross v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment constitutional-law criminal-sentencing cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process juvenile-sentencing precedent retroactivity state-supreme-court supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Florida Supreme Court violate Graham v. Florida, Miller v. Alabama, and Montgomery v. Louisiana when deciding Franklin v. State and State v. Michel, thereby overturning Atwell v. State?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the Florida Supreme Court violate Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S. Ct. 2011, 176 L. Ed. 2d 825 (2010), Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. _, 136 S. Ct. 718, 193 L. Ed. 2d 599 (2016), when deciding Franklin v. State, 258 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 2018) and State v. Michel, 257 So.3d 3 (Fla. 201 8), thereby overturning Atwell v. State, 197 So.3d 1040 (Fla. 2016)? . viii

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Craig Cross
Craig Cross — Petitioner
Craig Cross — Petitioner
Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent