No. 19-6272
Mauricio Lara-Bonilla v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky civil-rights discriminatory-intent due-process equal-protection juror-bias jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strike trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party's challenge for cause to a minority juror is a relevant circumstance a trial court should consider when evaluating claims of discriminatory intent in using a peremptory strike under Batson v. Kentucky
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED For claims that a party had a discriminatory intent in using a peremptory strike against a prospective juror under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), is that party’s challenge for cause to a minority juror among the relevant circumstances a trial court should consider? prefix
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Mauricio Lara-Bonilla
Harini P. Raghupathi — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent