Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED _ ALS Coe OAs @D LEC LMI LEY np PZ ALLME OC xe aed SA YB fg ; MCE, YL KAGE. ee 2 UW CtlaZ efx CO QAL , Lea ll. AB LLY fye ? OL C08 COMMIS AYBS. a Coxe teuy Of 4 Lied! | ibe CG. De ES 2, (3%, O QO YO Pty LORI > tC, Liberty) De phenh, . Le Digg <Ohtea, EI yeatide Lbs He ged ope; dv > ee ECO ef Rodeo LAO Claue, eg ge Fe REAL o, KE CLE. haa uoivie wo 4 oe Ce WE ont yp Ly WY LOO aa preg) OEE ttl 2 teas GE Cckggeny a 2) cee, / Za, CO Le. LATE, SSELAL Laer g fo £2 2 “lip lo, &/ (CZ, ‘ a DAPI, z, LOK a ae LZ =