No. 19-6275
Amici (1)Response WaivedIFP
Tags: act-of-production compelled-decryption due-process exception fifth-amendment foregone-conclusion self-incrimination testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Fifth Amendment's act of production doctrine apply to compelled decryption? If so, what does the foregone conclusion exception to the act of production doctrine require the government to show before an order to compel decryption can issue?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Does the Fifth Amendment’s act of production doctrine apply to compelled decryption? If so, what does the foregone conclusion exception to the act of production doctrine require the government to show before an order to compel decryption can issue? i
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-24
Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Public Counsel Services filed.
2019-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Massachusetts to respond filed.
2019-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Committee for Public Counsel Services
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Randall Evan Ravitz — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Dennis Jones
David James Nathanson — Wood & Nathanson, LLP, Petitioner