No. 19-6289
Brian Thomas Mohr v. United States
Tags: appellate-procedure case-review circuit-court-case criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-reconsideration jury-instructions legal-probability rehaif-v-united-states remand standard-of-review statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is a reasonable probability of different result if the court below is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of Rehaif v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether there is a reasonable probability of different result if the court below is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of Rehaif v. United States, _U.S.__, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (June 21, 2019)? 2. Whether there is a reasonable probability of a different result if the Appellant prevails on in the pending case of United States v. McGinnis, 19-10197 (5 Cir.), and the court below is instructed to reconsider its judgment in light of that forthcoming authority
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-18
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2019-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 18, 2019.
2019-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2019 to December 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Brian Thomas Mohr
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent