No. 19-6292

Malcolm Muhammad v. Y. Taylor, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights disciplinary-conviction district-court due-process evidence fourth-circuit good-time-credit hearing-rights jury-verdict liberty-interest parole retaliation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in deferring to the District Court's findings

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QueSTION (S) PRESENTED 1. Did the Fourth Groat erred in clelerring to the Distrol-Courk’s Siading | thot sae pelthinar wos rot given the opporkunily ha Notre era Neoing on his Piscrglinary Gnvickon and because he hos ~ i withart Parle and no good Aime credit fer porcle » neta no Yiberhy \nderest of dee priassot low, 2 2, Did Me Fourth clrut erred ta defevring te the Drshicdcourts Binding whether Delerdank Tylor and oftar delendanks tn-Suppertof cleCindoak-f lor relaliobed copinst the pebrhoner §or-Filing [. 3, uthelhr there Wos Mouse of Discretion by Yre Dishtcl Gut tn the jury vardick and did the Fourth Cireut ened based one evidence Submi bed ¢ — iN

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-22
Waiver of right of respondents Y. Taylor, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Malcolm Muhammad
Malcolm Muhammad — Petitioner
Malcolm Muhammad — Petitioner
Y. Taylor, et al.
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay HeytensOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent