No. 19-6295
Antonio Flores v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver appearance-of-partiality circuit-split constitutional-due-process constitutional-review district-court due-process judicial-bias judicial-impartiality miscarriage-of-justice plea-agreement sentencing-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a broad appeal waiver preclude appellate review of a district court's findings if the judge created a constitutionally impermissible appearance of partiality?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does a broad appeal waiver included in a plea agreement between a defendant and the United States preclude appellate review of the district court’s findings if the district judge created a constitutionally impermissible appearance of partiality by testifying against the defendant? ii INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent