Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights to due process, presumption of innocence, and effective assistance of counsel were violated

questions) PRESENTED eoddid I wear ak Mise rkids Rights to The vaited States CON St fy HON ; + TS CORA. TW Vio) Atom oF Hs rights to Dus ProtesS, 7Rudtd & Whether ue-Senk its Rights to The Uwited SHALE Cowst'but of WEE Violited When The Coveement INFRiWGed ufow His Righs to BE PRE Summed Liiocent Wheal Hss Priog Chem WAL Kistory Was Lit Koduced a MERNAL With Of ye Ly ry 13, rrouad 3 Whether MB. Senk? ' ; WERE Violaved MKS SiH AMendmenk Right's to ThE United Stufo Const} Aso When FEAL Couns) Failed 7 VON Fond PRE PARE, SAUL Chee Foe lo Com Duct PAETHis. Ta/vest Showa 4 Wheth HY TRIAL Ad Senfewe alg ‘ When The pa ee Ridhs To The duited HME dowsfit/on Were Violtte TEStimony py p Bused its Dis crepiow and lowed As Michell GORDON @ ee eee ~ ° oe ae |