No. 19-6307
Andrew Oreckinto v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-659 circuit-split criminal-law federal-jurisdiction statutory-construction statutory-interpretation statutory-reach
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit erred in adopting a reading of 18 U.S.C. § 659 unsupported by any relevant canon of statutory construction or relevant precedent?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Second Circuit erred in adopting a reading of 18 U.S.C. § 659 unsupported by any relevant canon of statutory construction or relevant precedent? IL. Whether the Second Circuit’s reading of the statute will drastically expand the reach of the statute beyond the intent of the drafters and beyond the understanding of the other circuits.
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Andrew Oreckinto
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent