Marilis Yaneth Velasquez Perez v. Jose Candido Diaz Palencia
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Did the lower courts err in determining that retention of the child was wrongful under the Hague Convention despite Guatemalan law giving custody to the mother?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : I. Did the lower courts err in determining that retention of the child was wrongful under Articles 3 and 5 of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction despite Articles 252 and 261 of the Guatemalan Civil Code giving Ms. Velasquez custody of the Child? II. Did the Eleventh Circuit on and violate Abbott v. Abbott, 560 U.S. 1 (2010) by finding that Ms. Velasquez had ne exeat rights yet upholding the District Court’s finding that Ms. Velasquez wrongfully retained the Child? _ :