No. 19-6312
Bryan Timothyleenard Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process habeas-corpus standard-of-review appellate-review certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus judicial-procedure legal-standard procedural-error standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred by denying petitioner's application for certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. 2
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2019)
Attorneys
Bryan Smith
Matthew P. Farmer — Farmer & Fitzgerald, Petitioner
Matthew P. Farmer — Farmer & Fitzgerald, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent