No. 19-6315

John David Stahlman v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment circuit-split constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-law fifth-amendment sentencing statutory-interpretation title-18-usc-2422(b)
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit violate the petitioner's Fifth Amendment right to due process of law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT : OF FLORIDA, AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, VIOLATE THE PETITIONER'S FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT, UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WHEN IT ACCEPTED A JURY'S VERDICT OF GUILTY, FOR AN OFFENSE UNDER TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE SERVICE, CHAPTER 117, SECTION 2422, SUBSECTION (b), WHERE AN ELEMENT REQUIRED IN OTHER CIRCUITS FOR A CONVICTION WAS NEITHER PROVEN NOR PLEAD TO? 2.) DID THE DECISION, ISSUED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, CONFLICT WITH THE DECISIONS ENTERED IN OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS ACROSS THE COUNRTY, WARRANTING CLARIFICATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AS TO WHAT CONDUCT IS PROSCRIBED UNDER TITLE 18 UNITED (by? CODE SERVICE, CHAPTER 117, SECTION 2422, SUBSECTION (b)? LIST OF PARITES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 21, 2019)

Attorneys

John David Stahlman
John Stahlman — Petitioner
John Stahlman — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent