Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019)

QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented in this case is as follows: Whether the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for reconsideration in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), where all involved understood that under then-binding precedent a § 922(g)(1) conviction did not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant know his alleged prohibited status at the time of the firearm possession?