No. 19-633

Edwin Arthur Avery v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-2244(b)(1) 28-usc-2254 28-usc-2255 federal-custody federal-prisoners habeas-corpus jurisdictional-limitation post-conviction-relief postconviction-relief second-or-successive-motion state-custody statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to federal prisoners seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Federal law divides prisoners seeking postconviction relief into two categories: those in state custody (covered under 28 U.S.C. § 2254) and those in federal custody (covered under 28 U.S.C. § 2255). A separate provision, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1), provides that “[a] claim presented in a second or successive application under section 2254 that was presented in a prior application shall be dismissed.” The question presented is: Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1) applies to federal prisoners seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. @ RELATED CASES Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 14.1(b)dii), the following proceedings are directly related to this case: In re Avery, No. 16-3566 (6th Cir. Sept. 29, 2016) (Dkt. No. 5-2). Ruling granting Avery’s request to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Avery, No. 3:07-cr-00205 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2016) (Dkt. No. 46). Judgment entered on Avery’s first motion to attack sentence under § 2255. United States v. Avery, No. 08-4271 (6th Cir. Aug. 21, 2006) (Dkt. No. 39-1). Judgment entered on Avery’s direct appeal of federal conviction. United States v. Avery, No. 3:07-cr-00205 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 10, 2008) (Dkt. No. 29). Judgment entered on Avery’s federal conviction. (ii)

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Kavanaugh respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-633_5if6.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2020-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-12
Reply of petitioner Edwin Arthur Avery filed.
2020-01-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 29, 2020.
2020-01-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2020 to January 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2020.
2019-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2019 to January 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Edwin Arthur Avery
Thomas Gregory SpranklingWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent