Whether plaintiff is entitled to relief from dismissal of lawsuit - Shavers v. Bergh (excessive use of force claims dismissed on the nature of the sustained injury, and not on the applied force) under Wilkins v. Gaddy, 559 U.S. 34 (2010) (reversing dismissal of prisoners' excessive use of force claims based on the nature of the sustained injury and not on the applied force) also under Allen v. Coughlin, 64 U.S. 544 n.1 (1986) (that appeal is not final until time for certiorari was passed)

No question identified. : Bue STION (Ss) PRESENTED ; qr WHETHER PLAINTIFF FS ENTITTLE TO RELLEF FRAM pore ment TN LAWSUIT) «= SHAVERS «VY BERGH (EXCESSIVE use af FORCE CLAIMS ISMDTSSEZ oN THE NATURE BF THE &USTAINED , EN [URY. AND "NBT ON THE APPLTED FORCE) UNDER WKLKINS NM GBAWOY, 55Q ws BY CQDIDD C RENERSING WISMESSAL OF . PRISONERS EXCESSIVE Use of FoRtE CLATMS BASE @N THE NATURE ot FHE SUSTATNED LN JURY AND NST BN THE APPLIED FARCE) ALSD UNDER ALLEN NO HARYY,: th GS. CT. PSSd FN. 1 CIGRbd CTHAT APPEAL ES NOT FINAL UNTXL FEME aR CERTIDRABI WAS PASSEYD 43NLE BERGA WAS Not FINAL ANDB PENWING oN LER TESRARE WHEN THIS CBRURT MANDED 7HWN WILKINS. a. WHETHER SEATH CIRCUIT fCauRT aF APPEALS RENZERET A DECTSIAN ION EONFLTICT wrt DeEcTSapanNS of THIS COURT ANY ~~ BF QOTRER Court Af APPEALS WHEN ZT RULED THAT DISMISSAL DF A PRISANEK EXCESSIVE USE oF FARCE CLAZMS = Snbeiy BASE oN “FHE APPRBATH AND WETERMINATLEN THAT PRESANER FATL Tao ALLEGE MaoRE THAN A DE MENEMIS EN (RY FOULS FA STATE A UTABLE * EXCESSIVE tise of FaRte Ctanms, | \ Tl. WHETHER SLXTA CERI UTY CauURT 46f APPEALS RENDERED A DECISTON” CEN CONFLICT WITH ECESTANS BF THIS ChURT ANY AY ATHER C&URT OF APPEALS WHEN ZT RULED THAT DENTAL DF PETITEONER APPLICATZDNS FOR ENTRIES Qt WEFANLS AGAENST FINE af THE DEEENTANTS BASE ON EMPROPER SERNZICE WAS APPROPRIATE WHEN DEFENDANTS ACCEPTED SERNILE bf SUMNBNS AND COMPLATNTS iy Mav FILE AN ANSWER, NAR MaTUON Th DISMISS FaR ITMPROPER RERNITE, OF ADNISE DISTRICT CaURT oF ANY PREJUDICE AND THEREBY WAZVE ‘THE TATUTORY RIGHT Te NOT HAVE ENTRIEL QF PVE FAULT AGAINST WEF ERTANTS, 7 LEST BF PARITES "Pye | PETITIONER (s) ARE MICHAEL GHAVERS, THE NAMED PLAINTIFF CS) rN THE ChuRT(S) BELAW IN WTS hwh | BEHALE. THE RESPOMDENT(S) MICHEGAN DEPARTMENT of CORRE CTESONS PRISON EMPLANEECS) ARE. DEFENDANT (8) LAVERN SHARP, DEPUTY WARYEN; je FPREY ELBUSE AND RABERT PARIAN, LIEUTENANTS; JASON THOMAS ANP ROBERT SANDERS, PRISQN CBUNERLS; ALSD, LARRY AW EAN ER? KEVIN BRAMLEY, SERGEANT; ROBERT ARON, ERIC RIGES, KENNETH QALENTCZAK, MICHAEL MEYER, Ran NALLEY, AND NATHAN GELBERT, PRISAN CORRECTLONER ATEICER (SS. ya APINIDNS BELOW PETLITANER RESPECTEULLY PRAYS THAT. A WRT OF CERTIORARI Fesut To REVIEW THE Jur GENT Beiaw. . FRR CASES FROM FEDERAL COURTS: THE BPINTONS BF TRE YWNITED STATES ChuRt a¥ APPEARS AT