No. 19-6349

Jarvas Jovon Brinkley v. Randee Rewerts, Warden

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2019-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lafler-v-cooper michigan-law sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the decisions below conflict with the decisions of other U.S. circuit courts of appeals and state appellate courts, and misapply this court's decisions in Strickland v Washington, and Lafler v Cooper, violating petitioner Jarvas Javon Brinkley's constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED DOES THE DECISIONS BELOW CONFLICT WITH THE DECISIONS OF OTHER U.S. CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND STATE APPELLATE COURTS, AND MISAPPLY THIS COURT'S DECISIONS IN STRICKLAND V WASHINGTON, AND LAFLER Vv COOPER, VIOLATING PETITIONER JARVAS JAVON BRINKLEY’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS? ; i

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Jarvas J. Brinkley
Jarvas Jovon Brinkley — Petitioner
Jarvas Jovon Brinkley — Petitioner