No. 19-6358

In Re Morris J. Warren

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-conflict circuit-split conflict-of-laws constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process ex-post-facto parole-eligibility retroactive-application sentencing sentencing-regulations statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Daniel v. Fulwood, Case No. 12-5327/Citation 766 F. 3d 57 (D.C. Cir. 2014), apply to my parole-eligible sentence, where which was given December 18, 1973, where which falls under Title 9 of 1972 parole regulations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Hy _ DOES DANIEL v. FULWOOD, CASE NO. 12-5327/CITATION 766 F. 3d 57 (D.C. CIR. 2014), APPLIES TO MY PAROLEBLE SENTENCE, WHERE WHICH WAS GIVEN DECEMBER 18, 1973, WHERE WHICH FALLS UNDER TITLE 9 OF 1972 PAROLE REGULATIONS? — ; DOES PETITIONER HAVE A SENTENCE THAT FALL UNDER THE EX POST FACTO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL ARTICLE 1, § 9, CLAUSE 3? IS THERE A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON, D.C. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CIRCUIT AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ABOUT WHERE WHICH MY PAROLE ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE UNDER?

Docket Entries

2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-08
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Morris Warren
Morris J. Warren — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent